What does it matter if you've got 2G or 3G if the results can't be rendered anyway?
Desktop grade IE6 coming to Windows Mobile 6.1 by the end of 2008
#4
Posted 25 April 2008 - 02:58 PM
What does it matter if you've got 2G or 3G if the results can't be rendered anyway?
#5
Posted 25 April 2008 - 02:59 PM
#6
Posted 25 April 2008 - 03:01 PM
Kallisti, on Apr 25 2008, 15:58, said:
What does it matter if you've got 2G or 3G if the results can't be rendered anyway?
The Wii runs Opera
P
Want to donate? MoDaCo is raising money the Multiple Sclerosis society.
#7
Posted 25 April 2008 - 03:02 PM
P
Want to donate? MoDaCo is raising money the Multiple Sclerosis society.
#9
Posted 25 April 2008 - 03:08 PM
P
Want to donate? MoDaCo is raising money the Multiple Sclerosis society.
#10
Posted 25 April 2008 - 03:46 PM
#11
Posted 25 April 2008 - 03:47 PM
P
Want to donate? MoDaCo is raising money the Multiple Sclerosis society.
#12
Posted 25 April 2008 - 04:34 PM
Kallisti, on Apr 25 2008, 14:58, said:
What does it matter if you've got 2G or 3G if the results can't be rendered anyway?
It is no trivial task developing a web browser, let alone a mobile browser, which is used on a very wide variety of devices. Apple has the luxury of developing software as well as their own hardware. It's also a little unfair to compare the Wii browser to a smartphone browser. However kudos to Apple for setting the standard with their iphone web browser.
#13
Posted 25 April 2008 - 05:48 PM
#14
Posted 26 April 2008 - 06:32 PM
Or should that be shame on BA for an unnecessarily painful check-in process - Emirates, Cathay, United and even South African Airways work fine on PocketIE
Edit to add: the BA regular site always worked on PocketIE so I'm not sure why showing the BA screen shot is anything ground breaking. It's the check-in process it can't handle.
This post has been edited by Stuart_f: 26 April 2008 - 06:38 PM
#15
Posted 27 April 2008 - 07:25 PM
#16
Posted 27 April 2008 - 10:52 PM
#17
Posted 28 April 2008 - 06:47 PM
#19
Posted 29 April 2008 - 07:22 PM
Paul (MVP), on Apr 25 2008, 17:02, said:
P
Nope, it's in IE8 that there are some significant standards compliance increase over IE7 (not that it'd come close to Opera 9.xx on the desktop); in this regard, I7 is equally crappy as IE6. See my tests at http://www.modaco.com/content/Pocket-PC-Ge...pliance-report/ . The relevant excerpt:
The Internet Explorer 8 beta (also the latest) results are pretty bad – actually, it’s the same as with IE7:

(IE8)

(IE7)
Interestingly, Acid2 is far better rendered by IE8 than IE7 (screenshots HERE and HERE, respectively) – while it still fails the Acid3 test (which also makes the browser crash), albeit it still fares a bit better than IE7. That is, based on the Acid results, I expected far more – not even the forthcoming IE8 is as standard-compliant as Firefox, let alone Opera.
#20
Posted 29 April 2008 - 07:23 PM
#21
Posted 29 April 2008 - 07:24 PM
Bill Fisher, on Apr 28 2008, 20:47, said:
Strange you've found it far better - it's almost exactly the same, engine-wise, than previous IE's. The only difference is the zoom menu item in the COntext menu.
#22
Posted 29 April 2008 - 07:25 PM
#23
Posted 29 April 2008 - 07:27 PM
gerryr, on Apr 25 2008, 16:09, said:
It sure would be sweet though, just wonder how a WM device would be able to handle a very graphic or flash heavy site?
It's possible when the Flash support is properly (!!) written. Just take a look at the Flash Lite 3 implementation on Symbian (like the v21 N95) - it just rocks and is VERY fast & efficient. Look at its YouTube playback performance and compare it to the old, full Flash 7...
If MSrewrites and heavily (!) optimizes (full) Flash, you won't encounter speed problems - Adobe / Nokia have certainly shown this with Flash Lite 3.
- ← 24th April only - open signup to the Evernote Beta!
- Windows Mobile News
- Trapster brings community generated Speed Trap information to your device →









