EXCLUSIVE: More Sagem details surface
#4
Posted 02 March 2004 - 10:23 AM
#5
Posted 02 March 2004 - 12:00 PM
the good thing is, Sagem also like their entertainment phones, so hopefully this will be sold as an entertainment phone rather than a pure busniess phone (the text on the image above puts entertainment before 'professional')
also, looking at the above image's screen size (and presuming its the same physical size as other smartphone screens), the phone looks smaller than the e100/e200 and the mpx100
now, what about an image that isnt watermarked
#6
Posted 02 March 2004 - 01:38 PM
#7
Posted 02 March 2004 - 02:48 PM
I skipped the phone ´cause my head got dizzy when being on the phone for more than 10minutes..
But I worked perfectly on the Orange (mobilix at that time) network in DK
So Sagem is normally in touch with new splutions, so I´m looking very much forward to this product.
/Jakob
#8
Posted 02 March 2004 - 03:02 PM
I imagine a cheap, compact cross network Smartphone will quite revolutionise Smartphone uptake rate...
P
Want to donate? MoDaCo is raising money the Multiple Sclerosis society.
#9
Posted 02 March 2004 - 03:32 PM
#10
Posted 02 March 2004 - 05:23 PM
What you can see of the phone looks pretty decent.
Finally, I very much hope it doesn't have asilly name. Personally, a phone called MY X-6 doesn't do it for me.
Sony CMD-J5 → Sony CMD-Z7 → Orange SPV → Orange SPV E100 → Orange SPV C500 → Orange SPV C600 → O2 Xda Graphite → Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 → Samsung Omnia 7
#11
Posted 02 March 2004 - 06:59 PM
Marketing samples march 2004
Launch Date May. 2004
/Jakob
#12
Posted 02 March 2004 - 07:19 PM
Orange HTC Touch Dual
Previous:
Palm 750v
Vodafone 1640/1240
SP5
VPA Compact
SP3
PDA2K
SP3i (Crap ROM and shocking Joystick!)
iPAQ 41** (Work thing)
e740 - WiFi - Bluetooth CF card - 256 SD
E200
Dev Voyager :) (Crap ROM though)
iPAQ 3660, Psion 5, Newton
1st GEN Mitac Mio (stolen in Hong Kong after 12 hours!!! :@)
SPV - 256 SD - 7th replacment!
Wish:
Touch Dual with GPS internal!
#15
Posted 03 March 2004 - 11:32 AM
Quote
encece, can you make sure the one you put in doesn't BUZZ
http://my.navizon.com/Webapps/UserAdmin/re...de=5D565A5A575D
#16
Posted 03 March 2004 - 01:50 PM
#17
Posted 03 March 2004 - 08:30 PM
http://bluesmudge.netfirms.com
#18
Posted 03 March 2004 - 08:33 PM
1. They have stupid names MY-Xblah blah
2. They have silly designs, or designs that are spoilt by something that just doesn't fit, and looks cheap
3. The software is rubbish.
In the case of this, number 3 obviously isn't an issue. Number 2 doesn't look like it is, from what we've seen so far.
Number 1, I can just about live with, if everything else is good.
Sony CMD-J5 → Sony CMD-Z7 → Orange SPV → Orange SPV E100 → Orange SPV C500 → Orange SPV C600 → O2 Xda Graphite → Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 → Samsung Omnia 7
#19
Posted 04 March 2004 - 01:52 AM
Real phone is more beautiful in fact. The device is targeted for all customers, not only corporate users. This is a very important point because Microsoft needs such a popular device to capture the masses. The sale price will be slightly smaller than competitors.
regards
#20
Posted 04 March 2004 - 01:56 AM
#22
Posted 08 March 2004 - 10:17 AM
Dave Woods
SPV-MPX200(deceased)-SPVE200
otheres Panasonic X70 - LG7100 - Sagem MYX6 - Nokia 7250i
#23
Posted 08 March 2004 - 10:21 AM
Quote
Hmmm, wonderful, certainly a term I haven't heard in connection with many SPVs...
As much as I am up for the elimination of ugly phones (hello Voq), let's not ban the Sagem until we've seen the real deal? :wink:
- ← Microsoft Development Conference - 300 hrs stand by...?
- Smartphone (Standard) News
- VOQ in europe →














